日本語View as Markdown

Effect of supplementation with hydrogen-rich water in patients with interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome.

間質性膀胱炎/膀胱痛症候群患者における水素水摂取の効果:無作為化二重盲検プラセボ対照試験

human randomized controlled trial hydrogen-rich water null

Abstract

A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled 30 patients (29 women, 1 man; mean age 64.0 ± 14.8 years) with interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome (IC/PBS) whose symptoms had been stable for at least 12 weeks following bladder hydrodistension. Participants were allocated in a 2:1 ratio to receive either hydrogen-rich water or placebo water for 8 weeks. Outcomes were measured using the Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index, Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index, Parsons' Pelvic Pain and Urgency/Frequency Patient Symptom Scale, visual analog scale bladder pain scores, and a 3-day voiding diary. Bladder pain scores declined significantly in both groups; however, no statistically significant difference was detected between the hydrogen-rich water and placebo groups on any primary or secondary endpoint. Notably, approximately 11% of patients in the hydrogen-rich water group showed marked improvement in bladder pain scores. Two participants withdrew before study completion.

Mechanism

An antioxidant mechanism was hypothesized, whereby hydrogen-rich water would reduce oxidative stress-driven bladder inflammation; however, no significant benefit over placebo was demonstrated in this trial.

Bibliographic

Authors
Matsumoto S, Ueda T, Kakizaki H
Journal
Urology
Year
2013
PMID
23374763
DOI
10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.026

Tags

Delivery:水素水経口投与 Mechanism:炎症抑制 酸化ストレス

Delivery context

Hydrogen-rich water is a low-risk delivery route, but the achievable systemic hydrogen dose is bounded. For clinical applications, inhalation is the most efficient route; inhalation, however, carries explosion risk, and concentration matters (empirical LFL of 10% applies to inhalation environments; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

Safety notes

Hydrogen-rich water is a low-risk delivery route, but the achievable systemic hydrogen dose is bounded. For clinical applications, inhalation is the most efficient route; inhalation, however, carries explosion risk, and concentration matters (empirical LFL of 10% applies to inhalation environments; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

See also:

Cite as: H2 Papers — PMID 23374763. https://h2-papers.org/en/papers/23374763
Source: PubMed PMID 23374763