日本語View as Markdown

Protective effects of hydrogen-rich saline on ulcerative colitis rat model.

水素富化生理食塩水による潰瘍性大腸炎ラットモデルへの保護効果

animal study injection / infusion positive

Abstract

Using a rat model of ulcerative colitis (UC) induced by intracolonic acetic acid administration, this study examined the effects of intraperitoneally injected hydrogen-rich saline at doses of 10 or 20 mL/kg, administered once every two days for two weeks. Animals receiving hydrogen-rich saline showed reduced body weight loss and diarrhea, along with improved macroscopic and microscopic colonic mucosal damage scores compared with untreated UC controls. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression, which was elevated in UC colonic mucosa, was suppressed following hydrogen administration. These findings suggest that the antioxidant properties of hydrogen-rich saline contribute to mucosal protection in UC, at least partly through downregulation of VEGF-mediated angiogenic signaling.

Mechanism

Hydrogen scavenges reactive oxygen species, thereby suppressing VEGF expression in colonic mucosa and reducing aberrant angiogenesis, which collectively attenuates mucosal injury in acetic acid-induced ulcerative colitis.

Bibliographic

Authors
He J, Xiong S, Zhang JH, Wang J, Sun A, Mei X, et al.
Journal
J Surg Res
Year
2013
PMID
23773716
DOI
10.1016/j.jss.2013.05.047

Tags

Disease:腸管障害 Delivery:点滴投与 Mechanism:抗酸化酵素 血管内皮機能 炎症抑制 酸化ストレス 活性酸素種

Delivery context

Intravenous hydrogen-saline infusion is a clinic-only route and is not viable for everyday self-administration. For routine hydrogen intake, inhalation is the most practical route, but inhalation carries explosion risk and concentration matters (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration 66% / 100% devices are not recommended).

Safety notes

Intravenous hydrogen-saline infusion is a clinic-only route and is not viable for everyday self-administration. For routine hydrogen intake, inhalation is the most practical route, but inhalation carries explosion risk and concentration matters (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration 66% / 100% devices are not recommended).

See also:

Other papers on the same disease / condition

Cite as: H2 Papers — PMID 23773716. https://h2-papers.org/en/papers/23773716
Source: PubMed PMID 23773716