日本語View as Markdown

Beneficial biological effects and the underlying mechanisms of molecular hydrogen - comprehensive review of 321 original articles.

分子状水素の有益な生物学的効果とその作用機序:321報の原著論文に基づく包括的レビュー

review mixed routes not assessed 4%

Abstract

Since 2007, research into the biological effects of molecular hydrogen has expanded rapidly across numerous disease models and clinical conditions. By June 2015, a total of 321 original papers had been published, with contributions predominantly from Japan, China, and the United States. Approximately three-quarters of these studies used rodent models, while the number of human clinical investigations has grown annually. Hydrogen-rich water administered ad libitum and hydrogen gas at concentrations below 4% via inhalation represent the most common delivery approaches, with hydrogen-rich saline used for confirmatory experiments. Effects have been documented across 31 disease categories encompassing 166 distinct models, with oxidative stress- and inflammation-related conditions being especially prominent. Beyond selective scavenging of hydroxyl radicals and peroxynitrite, mechanistic studies indicate that hydrogen modulates the activity and expression of signaling molecules including Lyn, ERK, p38, JNK, ASK1, Akt, GTP-Rac1, iNOS, Nox1, NF-κB p65, IκBα, STAT3, NFATc1, c-Fos, and ghrelin. The identity of upstream master regulators coordinating these changes remains under active investigation.

Mechanism

Molecular hydrogen selectively neutralizes hydroxyl radicals and peroxynitrite, and additionally modulates the activity or expression of multiple signaling molecules—including Lyn, ERK, p38, JNK, ASK1, Akt, NF-κB p65, STAT3, and ghrelin—thereby exerting antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects through diverse intracellular pathways.

Bibliographic

Authors
Ichihara M, Sobue S, Ito M, Hirayama M, Ohno K
Journal
Med Gas Res
Year
2015
PMID
26483953
DOI
10.1186/s13618-015-0035-1
PMC
PMC4610055

Tags

Mechanism:ヒドロキシルラジカル消去 免疫調節 炎症抑制 Nrf2 経路 酸化ストレス ペルオキシナイトライト消去 活性酸素種

Delivery context

This study combines multiple delivery routes. As a general principle, the most efficient route for routine hydrogen intake is inhalation. Inhalation carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

Safety notes

This study combines multiple delivery routes. As a general principle, the most efficient route for routine hydrogen intake is inhalation. Inhalation carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

See also:

Cite as: H2 Papers — PMID 26483953. https://h2-papers.org/en/papers/26483953
Source: PubMed PMID 26483953