日本語View as Markdown

Hydrogen gas protects IP3Rs by reducing disulfide bridges in human keratinocytes under oxidative stress.

酸化ストレス下のヒトケラチノサイトにおいて水素ガスがジスルフィド結合を還元することでIP3Rを保護する

in vitro study in vitro positive

Abstract

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated by hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) are implicated in skin aging through oxidative modification of proteins, particularly via disulfide bond formation at cysteine and methionine residues. Using H₂O₂-treated human keratinocytes as a model of skin aging, this study found that H₂O₂ impaired ATP-induced Ca²⁺ signaling in a dose-dependent manner, linked to disulfide bond formation in inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors (IP3Rs). Co-treatment with β-mercaptoethanol partially restored Ca²⁺ responses by reducing these disulfide bonds. Molecular hydrogen (H₂) demonstrated superior protection of IP3R1 function compared with direct ROS scavenging, acting primarily through reduction of disulfide bridges rather than quenching oxidants. These findings suggest that ROS-driven disulfide bond formation in Ca²⁺-signaling proteins is a key mechanism in skin aging, and that H₂ can counteract this process.

Mechanism

H₂ protects IP3R1-mediated Ca²⁺ signaling primarily by reducing oxidative disulfide bonds formed at cysteine/methionine residues, rather than by directly scavenging ROS.

Bibliographic

Authors
Wu CY, Hsu WL, Tsai MH, Liang JL, Lu J, Yen CJ, et al.
Journal
Sci Rep
Year
2017 (2017-06-15)
PMID
28620198
DOI
10.1038/s41598-017-03513-2
PMC
PMC5472599

Tags

Disease:老化・フレイル 皮膚疾患 Mechanism:抗酸化酵素 ヒドロキシルラジカル消去 脂質過酸化 酸化ストレス 活性酸素種

Delivery context

This is basic research at the cellular or molecular level. For human application, inhalation is the most promising delivery route, but inhalation carries explosion risk and concentration matters (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are not recommended).

Safety notes

This is basic research at the cellular or molecular level. For human application, inhalation is the most promising delivery route, but inhalation carries explosion risk and concentration matters (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are not recommended).

See also:

Other papers on the same disease / condition

Cite as: H2 Papers — PMID 28620198. https://h2-papers.org/en/papers/28620198
Source: PubMed PMID 28620198