日本語View as Markdown

Potential Therapeutic Applications of Hydrogen in Chronic Inflammatory Diseases: Possible Inhibiting Role on Mitochondrial Stress.

慢性炎症性疾患における水素の可能性:ミトコンドリアストレス抑制を介したメカニズムの考察

review not specified not assessed

Abstract

Mitochondria are the primary intracellular source of reactive oxygen species (ROS), generating substantial quantities of the highly reactive hydroxyl radical (•OH). Molecular hydrogen (H2) can selectively neutralize •OH within mitochondria. Inflammatory responses are initiated by proinflammatory cytokines released from macrophages and neutrophils; however, dysregulated or excessive responses can culminate in acute or chronic inflammatory disease. Emerging evidence indicates that ROS activate NLRP3 inflammasomes, which in turn drive proinflammatory cytokine production. Although H2 has been shown to suppress mitochondrial ROS, the precise mechanism by which it may inhibit NLRP3 inflammasome activation through mitochondrial oxidation remains unclear. This review proposes a hypothetical mechanistic framework in which H2 attenuates mitochondrial oxidative stress, thereby reducing inflammasome-mediated inflammation. The authors discuss potential relevance to a range of chronic inflammatory conditions, including COVID-19.

Mechanism

H2 is proposed to selectively scavenge mitochondria-derived hydroxyl radicals, thereby suppressing ROS-dependent NLRP3 inflammasome activation and reducing downstream proinflammatory cytokine production.

Bibliographic

Authors
Hirano S, Ichikawa Y, Sato B, Yamamoto H, Takefuji Y, Satoh F
Journal
Int J Mol Sci
Year
2021 (2021-03-04)
PMID
33806292
DOI
10.3390/ijms22052549
PMC
PMC7961517

Tags

Disease:COVID-19 Mechanism:アポトーシス抑制 ヒドロキシルラジカル消去 免疫調節 炎症抑制 ミトコンドリア 活性酸素種

Delivery context

The delivery route is not clearly identifiable from this paper. For hydrogen intake, inhalation is the most efficient route; inhalation, however, carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are not recommended).

Safety notes

The delivery route is not clearly identifiable from this paper. For hydrogen intake, inhalation is the most efficient route; inhalation, however, carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are not recommended).

See also:

Other papers on the same disease / condition

Cite as: H2 Papers — PMID 33806292. https://h2-papers.org/en/papers/33806292
Source: PubMed PMID 33806292