日本語View as Markdown

Cell surface sphingomyelin: key role in cancer initiation, progression, and immune evasion.

細胞表面スフィンゴミエリンの過剰蓄積とがん発生・進行・免疫回避における役割

review not specified not assessed

Abstract

Excessive accumulation of sphingomyelin (SM) in the outer leaflet of the cell surface membrane is increasingly recognized as a central factor in cancer initiation, tumor growth, and evasion of host immunity. SM molecules form dense inter- and intramolecular hydrogen bond networks; when this network becomes overly rigid, it disrupts contact inhibition between cells, impairs intracellular and intercellular signaling, alters metabolic pathways, and reduces susceptibility to immune effectors. This review examines the mechanisms by which tumors escape immune surveillance, including deficient MHC class I expression, reduced Fas accessibility, and loss of natural killer cell checkpoint molecules. It further highlights the underappreciated role of SM synthesis and hydrolysis in carcinogenesis and metastasis promotion. Evidence is presented linking elevated surface SM levels to resistance to apoptosis, insensitivity to growth-suppressive signals, and immune escape, with discussion of potential novel strategies for cancer control.

Mechanism

Excessive SM accumulation in the outer cell membrane leaflet creates an overly rigid hydrogen bond network, disrupting contact inhibition, impairing growth-suppressive signaling, and reducing immune cell recognition, thereby facilitating carcinogenesis and metastasis.

Bibliographic

Authors
Tallima H, Azzazy HME, El Ridi R
Journal
Lipids Health Dis
Year
2021 (2021-10-31)
PMID
34717628
DOI
10.1186/s12944-021-01581-y
PMC
PMC8557557

Tags

Disease:がん化学療法 (副作用軽減) Mechanism:アポトーシス抑制 免疫調節 炎症抑制 酸化ストレス 活性酸素種

Delivery context

The delivery route is not clearly identifiable from this paper. For hydrogen intake, inhalation is the most efficient route; inhalation, however, carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are not recommended).

Safety notes

The delivery route is not clearly identifiable from this paper. For hydrogen intake, inhalation is the most efficient route; inhalation, however, carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are not recommended).

See also:

Other papers on the same disease / condition

Cite as: H2 Papers — PMID 34717628. https://h2-papers.org/en/papers/34717628
Source: PubMed PMID 34717628