日本語View as Markdown

Can molecular hydrogen supplementation enhance physical performance in healthy adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

健康成人における水素補給と運動パフォーマンスの関係:系統的レビューとメタ解析

meta-analysis mixed routes mixed

Abstract

A systematic review and meta-analysis incorporating 27 studies and 597 healthy adult participants examined how H₂ supplementation influences multiple dimensions of physical performance. Effect size analyses revealed no statistically significant improvements in aerobic endurance (VO₂: SMD = 0.09), anaerobic endurance (SMD = 0.19), or muscular strength (SMD = 0.19). However, lower limb explosive power showed a small but significant improvement (SMD = 0.30, p = 0.018). H₂ supplementation was also associated with significant reductions in rating of perceived exertion (SMD = −0.37, p = 0.009) and blood lactate concentration (SMD = −0.37, p = 0.001), while average heart rate was unaffected. Evidence quality was assessed using the GRADE framework. The authors conclude that H₂ may benefit explosive power and fatigue-related markers but does not appear to meaningfully enhance endurance or strength outcomes, and that more rigorously designed trials are warranted.

Mechanism

H₂ is proposed to reduce exercise-induced oxidative stress and inflammatory responses through its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, thereby attenuating blood lactate accumulation and perceived exertion during physical activity.

Bibliographic

Authors
Zhou KW, Shang Z, Yuan C, Guo Z, Wang Y, Bao D, et al.
Journal
Front Nutr
Year
2024
PMID
38903627
DOI
10.3389/fnut.2024.1387657
PMC
PMC11188335

Tags

Disease:運動・疲労回復 Delivery:水素水経口投与 Mechanism:抗酸化酵素 炎症抑制 酸化ストレス 活性酸素種

Delivery context

This study combines multiple delivery routes. As a general principle, the most efficient route for routine hydrogen intake is inhalation. Inhalation carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

Safety notes

This study combines multiple delivery routes. As a general principle, the most efficient route for routine hydrogen intake is inhalation. Inhalation carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

See also:

Other papers on the same disease / condition

Cite as: H2 Papers — PMID 38903627. https://h2-papers.org/en/papers/38903627
Source: PubMed PMID 38903627