日本語View as Markdown

Randomized, crossover clinical efficacy trial in humans and mice on tear secretion promotion and lacrimal gland protection by molecular hydrogen.

分子状水素による涙液分泌促進および涙腺保護効果:ヒトおよびマウスを対象としたランダム化クロスオーバー試験

human randomized controlled trial mixed routes positive

Abstract

Dry eye disease, driven by aging and widespread digital device use, involves tear-film instability and osmotic stress-induced inflammation. This randomized crossover study examined whether a sustained hydrogen-generating supplement could address both pathologies. In 10 human participants, oral supplementation significantly elevated exhaled H2 concentration (p<0.01), improved tear stability (p<0.01), and reduced dry eye symptoms (p<0.05). Parallel mouse experiments demonstrated that H2 administration significantly increased tear secretion in healthy animals (p<0.05) and suppressed tear volume reduction in a murine dry eye model (p=0.007). The findings suggest that molecular hydrogen may simultaneously target tear-film instability and lacrimal gland dysfunction, warranting larger-scale investigation.

Mechanism

Molecular hydrogen is proposed to protect lacrimal gland tissue and stimulate tear secretion, thereby simultaneously addressing tear-film instability and osmotic stress-driven inflammation in the ocular surface.

Bibliographic

Authors
Kubota M, Kawashima M, Inoue S, Imada T, Nakamura S, Kubota S, et al.
Journal
Sci Rep
Year
2021 (2021-03-19)
PMID
33742060
DOI
10.1038/s41598-021-85895-y
PMC
PMC7979688

Tags

Disease:網膜疾患 Delivery:水素水経口投与 Mechanism:抗酸化酵素 免疫調節 炎症抑制 酸化ストレス

Delivery context

This study combines multiple delivery routes. As a general principle, the most efficient route for routine hydrogen intake is inhalation. Inhalation carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

Safety notes

This study combines multiple delivery routes. As a general principle, the most efficient route for routine hydrogen intake is inhalation. Inhalation carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

See also:

Other papers on the same disease / condition

Cite as: H2 Papers — PMID 33742060. https://h2-papers.org/en/papers/33742060
Source: PubMed PMID 33742060