Efficacy of inhaled hydrogen on neurological outcome following brain ischaemia during post-cardiac arrest care (HYBRID II): a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
院外心停止後の脳虚血に対する水素吸入の神経学的転帰への効果(HYBRID II):多施設無作為化二重盲検プラセボ対照試験
Abstract
The HYBRID II trial examined whether 18-hour inhalation of 2% molecular hydrogen gas improves outcomes in comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) of cardiogenic origin. Conducted across 15 Japanese hospitals from 2017 to 2021, the study enrolled 73 patients randomised to hydrogen (n=39) or control (n=34) groups. The primary endpoint—proportion achieving Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1 or 2 at 90 days—was 56% in the hydrogen group versus 39% in controls, a difference that did not reach statistical significance (relative risk 0.72; 95% CI 0.46–1.13; P=0.15). Secondary endpoints showed statistically significant advantages for hydrogen: median modified Rankin Scale scores were 1 versus 5 (P=0.01), and 90-day survival rates were 85% versus 61% (P=0.02). Enrolment was curtailed prematurely due to COVID-19 restrictions, limiting statistical power. The findings suggest a potential benefit of hydrogen inhalation on survival and functional recovery, warranting further adequately powered investigation.
Mechanism
Molecular hydrogen is proposed to selectively scavenge hydroxyl radicals and peroxynitrite generated during ischaemia-reperfusion following cardiac arrest, thereby reducing oxidative neuronal injury and supporting neurological recovery.
Bibliographic
- Authors
- Tamura T, Suzuki M, Homma K, Sano M
- Journal
- EClinicalMedicine
- Year
- 2023
- PMID
- 36969346
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101907
- PMC
- PMC10030910
Tags
Delivery context
In air, molecular hydrogen is reported to be combustible across approximately **4% (LFL, lower flammability limit) to 75% (UFL, upper flammability limit)**. Among high-concentration hydrogen inhalers, 66% output sits inside this range, and even pure-hydrogen (100%) output forms a 4–75% concentration-gradient layer at the device–air boundary (the UFL 75% paradox). Engineering principle would therefore call for operation below LFL (the classical 4%); that figure, however, was measured under closed, pre-mixed, static conditions. For the open, dynamic inhalation environment, the empirical value reported in the literature is **10%**, which is the figure referenced in practice as the operating ceiling. The 66% / 100% output devices are recorded in the Japanese Consumer Affairs Agency accident-information database, and from these considerations are not recommended.
Safety notes
See also: