日本語View as Markdown

Estimation of the hydrogen concentration in rat tissue using an airtight tube following the administration of hydrogen via various routes.

各種投与経路による水素投与後のラット組織内水素濃度の推定:気密チューブを用いた新規測定法

animal study mixed routes not assessed

Abstract

This study examined hydrogen concentration dynamics in Wistar rat blood and organ tissues following four distinct delivery routes: oral hydrogen super-rich water, intraperitoneal hydrogen super-rich saline, intravenous hydrogen super-rich saline, and inhaled hydrogen gas. A newly developed measurement approach combined high-sensitivity sensor gas chromatography with tissue homogenization performed inside airtight tubes, enabling stable and precise quantification. Peak hydrogen concentrations were observed at 5 minutes post-administration for oral and intraperitoneal routes, whereas intravenous delivery produced a peak at 1 minute. Inhalation resulted in a significant and sustained elevation beginning at 30 minutes. These findings establish a reliable analytical framework for characterizing hydrogen pharmacokinetics across tissues, which may inform the design of future experimental and clinical investigations involving molecular hydrogen.

Mechanism

Hydrogen concentration kinetics in rat tissues vary by delivery route: intravenous administration produces the fastest peak at 1 minute, oral and intraperitoneal routes peak at 5 minutes, and inhalation yields a sustained elevation from 30 minutes onward, reflecting differences in absorption and distribution pathways.

Bibliographic

Authors
Liu C, Kurokawa R, Fujino M, Hirano S, Sato B, Li XM
Journal
Sci Rep
Year
2014 (2014-06-30)
PMID
24975958
DOI
10.1038/srep05485
PMC
PMC4074787

Tags

Disease:虚血再灌流障害 Delivery:吸入投与 点滴投与 水素水経口投与 Mechanism:炎症抑制 酸化ストレス

Delivery context

This study combines multiple delivery routes. As a general principle, the most efficient route for routine hydrogen intake is inhalation. Inhalation carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

Safety notes

This study combines multiple delivery routes. As a general principle, the most efficient route for routine hydrogen intake is inhalation. Inhalation carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

See also:

Other papers on the same disease / condition

Cite as: H2 Papers — PMID 24975958. https://h2-papers.org/en/papers/24975958
Source: PubMed PMID 24975958