日本語View as Markdown

Protective effects of molecular hydrogen on lung injury from lung transplantation.

肺移植における分子状水素の肺傷害保護効果に関するレビュー

review mixed routes not assessed

Abstract

Lung transplantation exposes grafts to warm ischemia, cold ischemia, and reperfusion injury, all of which contribute to primary graft dysfunction—a leading cause of post-transplant morbidity and mortality. This review consolidates experimental evidence on the effects of molecular hydrogen (H2) on transplantation-associated lung injury. Studies in animal models demonstrated that H2, delivered via inhalation, oral hydrogen-rich water, hydrogen-rich saline injection, or hydrogen-rich water baths, improved transplant outcomes during both donor and recipient phases by reducing oxidative stress and inflammatory responses. H2 appears to modulate signal transduction and gene expression, leading to suppression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and attenuation of excess reactive oxygen species production. Its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-apoptotic properties are well-documented, though precise mechanistic pathways remain incompletely characterized. The authors conclude that further animal studies and early-phase human trials are needed to establish a clinical foundation for H2 application in lung transplantation.

Mechanism

H2 modulates signal transduction and gene expression to suppress pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion and reduce excess reactive oxygen species production, thereby attenuating oxidative stress and inflammation in transplanted lung tissue.

Bibliographic

Authors
Quan L, Zheng B, Zhou H
Journal
Exp Biol Med (Maywood)
Year
2021
PMID
33899545
DOI
10.1177/15353702211007084
PMC
PMC8243213

Tags

Disease:虚血再灌流障害 Delivery:吸入投与 点滴投与 水素水経口投与 Mechanism:アポトーシス抑制 炎症抑制 酸化ストレス 活性酸素種

Delivery context

This study combines multiple delivery routes. As a general principle, the most efficient route for routine hydrogen intake is inhalation. Inhalation carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

Safety notes

This study combines multiple delivery routes. As a general principle, the most efficient route for routine hydrogen intake is inhalation. Inhalation carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

See also:

Other papers on the same disease / condition

Cite as: H2 Papers — PMID 33899545. https://h2-papers.org/en/papers/33899545
Source: PubMed PMID 33899545