日本語View as Markdown

Prospects of molecular hydrogen in cancer prevention and treatment.

分子状水素によるがん予防・抑制の可能性:腸内フローラ産生H₂と免疫調節を中心としたレビュー

review mixed routes not assessed

Abstract

Gaseous signaling molecules such as carbon monoxide, nitric oxide, and hydrogen sulfide have established precedents for gas-based oncological applications. Hydrogen gas (H₂), a mildly reductive molecule, has emerged as a candidate in this field. Evidence indicates that H₂ selectively neutralizes highly reactive oxygen species (ROS) and suppresses ROS-dependent intracellular signaling, thereby reducing cancer cell proliferation and metastatic potential. In the context of radiation and chemotherapy, H₂ appears to attenuate oxidative tissue damage and immunosuppression, with potential implications for prognosis. Immunologically, H₂ has been associated with inhibition of T cell exhaustion and enhancement of anti-tumor T cell activity. Notably, the human gut microbiota constitutes a continuous endogenous source of H₂, which may contribute to systemic tumor resistance. This review consolidates current understanding of gut-flora-derived H₂ and immune homeostasis, the mechanistic basis of H₂'s anti-tumor activity, and practical delivery considerations, aiming to inform future research directions in comprehensive cancer care.

Mechanism

H₂ selectively scavenges highly cytotoxic ROS such as hydroxyl radicals and peroxynitrite, suppressing ROS-dependent signaling pathways that drive cancer cell proliferation and metastasis; this ROS-neutralizing capacity is also proposed to underlie H₂'s immunomodulatory effects, including inhibition of T cell exhaustion and enhancement of anti-tumor immune responses.

Bibliographic

Authors
Zhou W, Zhang JH, Chen W, Miao C
Journal
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol
Year
2024 (2024-03-31)
PMID
38555538
DOI
10.1007/s00432-024-05685-7
PMC
PMC10982102

Tags

Disease:がん化学療法 (副作用軽減) がん放射線療法 (副作用軽減) Mechanism:ヒドロキシルラジカル消去 免疫調節 酸化ストレス ペルオキシナイトライト消去 活性酸素種

Delivery context

This study combines multiple delivery routes. As a general principle, the most efficient route for routine hydrogen intake is inhalation. Inhalation carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

Safety notes

This study combines multiple delivery routes. As a general principle, the most efficient route for routine hydrogen intake is inhalation. Inhalation carries explosion risk (empirical LFL of 10%; high-concentration devices are documented in the Consumer Affairs Agency accident database and are not recommended).

See also:

Other papers on the same disease / condition

Cite as: H2 Papers — PMID 38555538. https://h2-papers.org/en/papers/38555538
Source: PubMed PMID 38555538